It has been suggested that the Goverment is about to sign off the scrapping of BREEAM as a requirement for school design following Sebastian James' singling it out as part of 'the excessive burden of regulation'. While not being perfect, BREEAM has achieved some major changes to our industry and it seems reckless to chuck it out without reallocating the best bits into the Building Regs and Planning. UKGBC and the Aldersagate Group have written an excellent letter which was reported in Building's Breaking News on Tuesday
http://www.building.co.uk/5030948.article?origin=bldgbreakingnewsletter.
So yesterday I wrote to Secretary of State Gove on behalf of the former Zero Carbon Task Force:
"I write as the Chairman of the former Zero Carbon Schools Task Force (2009-10) to express my concern that you may be considering the dropping of the BREEAM metric. My understanding is that, far from being a major burden, the construction industry has responded pretty well to this challenge, as it usually does, and that BREEAM Excellent has delivered significant carbon savings at next to no cost (+ 0.7%).
The industry needs certainty of work flow and the progressive raising of standards to a timetable so that it can prepare and not waste money gearing up for a phantom. The overall task of saving 34% of UK emissions by 2030 en route for 80% reduction by 2050 is a difficult challenge and schools have a key role to play both in the actual reduction of emissions and in the behaviour change of tomorrow’s citizens, whose futures we can so easily jeopardise.
Few would defend the last letter of BREEAM and some of the items have passed or can readily and more properly pass into the Building Regulations and the Planning process; BRE could certainly feed back much more to the industry. The Department has a long tradition of research and learning from what has and has not been achieved in school design. So I hope I am mistaken in being led to understand that your Department is preventing Partnerships for Schools from publishing the excellent Post-Occupancy Evaluation work that they have done. At a time of major change as the industry strives to mitigate the effects of the changing climate, we desperately need this feedback in order to do for less and to build more resilient schools.
So please do not abandon BREEAM until there has been a full review of its impact and the key elements relocated, as is being done with the Code for Sustainable Homes at CLG. And on behalf of the Zero Carbon Task Force, I would be grateful if you could re-convene a meeting of the TF so we can explain to you and your officials how Energy and Carbon Savings can be made at little or no additional cost to prepare your estate for a more sustainable future."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment